<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zwick/Herskovitz: WGA Friends Or Foes? UPDATE: Herskovitz Helps Clarify Deal</title>
	<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-11027</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-11027</guid>
		<description>Exactly. Herskovitz and Zwick's deal serves the objective function of making it easier for NBC to hold out, and therefore, 1) elongating the time that writers and production staff are unpaid, 2) making it more likely that the strike will lose entirely.

When there was a stronger labor movement in this country, it was understood by more people that anything serving those objective functions is the definition of scabbing. That tradition has largely been lost, which is one reason I'm so proud of the writers who are striking, as well as the showrunners, Teamsters and SAG members who have shown truly impressive solidarity.

Regardless of anyone's intentions, an action has to be judged by whether it's going to help the studios beat the strike, or help the writers win. This, sadly, does the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. Herskovitz and Zwick&#8217;s deal serves the objective function of making it easier for NBC to hold out, and therefore, 1) elongating the time that writers and production staff are unpaid, 2) making it more likely that the strike will lose entirely.</p>
<p>When there was a stronger labor movement in this country, it was understood by more people that anything serving those objective functions is the definition of scabbing. That tradition has largely been lost, which is one reason I&#8217;m so proud of the writers who are striking, as well as the showrunners, Teamsters and SAG members who have shown truly impressive solidarity.</p>
<p>Regardless of anyone&#8217;s intentions, an action has to be judged by whether it&#8217;s going to help the studios beat the strike, or help the writers win. This, sadly, does the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noho</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10944</link>
		<dc:creator>Noho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10944</guid>
		<description>TIA -- No one is saying the model is a bad idea. They are arguing whether it's appropriate to sell NBC content during the strike.

And Larry M -- The showrunners are also under contract. But they took a courageous stand. I wish that Marshall and Ed would do the same. 

Here is what a British business magazine is saying:

Those Hollywood writers who are taking part in the ill-judged writers strike should pay attention to NBC's latest move. It is planning on airing Quarterlife - a web series aimed at teens that made its debut on MySpace last year - to fill its schedules. Although Quarterlife's online episodes are just six minutes in length, NBC is going to string them together to make an hour long show. The writers should take note; good stuff is being produced on the web and this kind of content could provide a quick fix that will enable the TV stations to hold out for longer.

... For those working in web entertainment - few of whom stick to the kinds of Spanish practices that plague much of the traditional media – this is a dream. They will be more than happy to fill the void left by the lack of TV programming. The writers need to back down before they do any more irreparable damage to their own livelihoods.

http://www.thebusiness.co.uk/trading-floor/360121/web-content-could-make-hollywood-writers-back-down.thtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TIA &#8212; No one is saying the model is a bad idea. They are arguing whether it&#8217;s appropriate to sell NBC content during the strike.</p>
<p>And Larry M &#8212; The showrunners are also under contract. But they took a courageous stand. I wish that Marshall and Ed would do the same. </p>
<p>Here is what a British business magazine is saying:</p>
<p>Those Hollywood writers who are taking part in the ill-judged writers strike should pay attention to NBC&#8217;s latest move. It is planning on airing Quarterlife - a web series aimed at teens that made its debut on MySpace last year - to fill its schedules. Although Quarterlife&#8217;s online episodes are just six minutes in length, NBC is going to string them together to make an hour long show. The writers should take note; good stuff is being produced on the web and this kind of content could provide a quick fix that will enable the TV stations to hold out for longer.</p>
<p>&#8230; For those working in web entertainment - few of whom stick to the kinds of Spanish practices that plague much of the traditional media – this is a dream. They will be more than happy to fill the void left by the lack of TV programming. The writers need to back down before they do any more irreparable damage to their own livelihoods.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thebusiness.co.uk/trading-floor/360121/web-content-could-make-hollywood-writers-back-down.thtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.thebusiness.co.uk/trading-floor/360121/web-content-could-make-hollywood-writers-back-down.thtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truth in advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10917</link>
		<dc:creator>truth in advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10917</guid>
		<description>I have read the comments on the Bedford Falls story with great interest.  While the strike remains a very complicated issue, in analyzing what Marshall wrote, and speaking to many industry sources, there is nothing unethical about the sale of Quarterlife (which was done long before the strike).  In fact, the scripts were written months ago and most of the episodes before the strike.  What am I missing?  That those guys helped create a model that many writers and producers can follow for years to come?  That they had the courage to fund production of a pilot of out their own pockets(whoever wrote the number of what that cost is an idiot and doesn't have a clue about production or the real cost of the pilot)?  That they have stepped up when all of you are bashing the Studios and networks and done something about getting outside the conventional system?  You can not like their work, not like them, not like the internet, not like anything you want, but to talk about this as impropriety or immoral business behavior is ludicrous.  

Now, for the important part.  Whoever is commenting about their lack of success or quality of their work needs to be institutionalized. By any criteria, commercial or critical, they have almost unprecedented success in a business, where, I venture to guess, most of you have achieved true mediocrity.  Just so there is no confusion, Bedford Falls, since it's inception, has produced a number of feature films and television shows.  In the feature arena, their films have been nominated for 35 Academy Awards and won 15.  These films have grossed 1.6 Billion dollars.  They were also nominated for numerous Humanitas awards, AFI best lists, DGA, WGA, and won the first ever Stanley Kramer award from the PGA for socially conscious filmmaking, and honored by the AFI.  What other criteria should be used to evaluate their work (which some of you have called "mediocre")?  I have not even bothered to tally the Golden Globe wins and nominations as it might be redundant.

Their television work has also been nominated for 59 Emmys and won 15, and has spawned the careers of many of the most talented writers, producers and directors working in television today.

Whoever wrote "ask any writer who has worked with them", I have.  In fact, the vast majority would do it again in a heartbeat, as it is rare to even attempt to do the quality of work that they have done and tried to do over the years. 

Attack the quality of Quarterlife if you will(though I and many critics disagree), but to attack their character or the quality of the work, is utter nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read the comments on the Bedford Falls story with great interest.  While the strike remains a very complicated issue, in analyzing what Marshall wrote, and speaking to many industry sources, there is nothing unethical about the sale of Quarterlife (which was done long before the strike).  In fact, the scripts were written months ago and most of the episodes before the strike.  What am I missing?  That those guys helped create a model that many writers and producers can follow for years to come?  That they had the courage to fund production of a pilot of out their own pockets(whoever wrote the number of what that cost is an idiot and doesn&#8217;t have a clue about production or the real cost of the pilot)?  That they have stepped up when all of you are bashing the Studios and networks and done something about getting outside the conventional system?  You can not like their work, not like them, not like the internet, not like anything you want, but to talk about this as impropriety or immoral business behavior is ludicrous.  </p>
<p>Now, for the important part.  Whoever is commenting about their lack of success or quality of their work needs to be institutionalized. By any criteria, commercial or critical, they have almost unprecedented success in a business, where, I venture to guess, most of you have achieved true mediocrity.  Just so there is no confusion, Bedford Falls, since it&#8217;s inception, has produced a number of feature films and television shows.  In the feature arena, their films have been nominated for 35 Academy Awards and won 15.  These films have grossed 1.6 Billion dollars.  They were also nominated for numerous Humanitas awards, AFI best lists, DGA, WGA, and won the first ever Stanley Kramer award from the PGA for socially conscious filmmaking, and honored by the AFI.  What other criteria should be used to evaluate their work (which some of you have called &#8220;mediocre&#8221;)?  I have not even bothered to tally the Golden Globe wins and nominations as it might be redundant.</p>
<p>Their television work has also been nominated for 59 Emmys and won 15, and has spawned the careers of many of the most talented writers, producers and directors working in television today.</p>
<p>Whoever wrote &#8220;ask any writer who has worked with them&#8221;, I have.  In fact, the vast majority would do it again in a heartbeat, as it is rare to even attempt to do the quality of work that they have done and tried to do over the years. </p>
<p>Attack the quality of Quarterlife if you will(though I and many critics disagree), but to attack their character or the quality of the work, is utter nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry McGillicuddy</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10794</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry McGillicuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10794</guid>
		<description>I really wish people would fully read articles before making their comments. 

As states in his comments, they could not legally reject NBC's offer. Someone please explain to me why they should be attacked for, I don't know, following the law.

It's also not that hard for those of us with reading comprehension to understand this wasn't produced during the strike, it wasn't written during the strike, and NBC is buying a completed show, not a script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish people would fully read articles before making their comments. </p>
<p>As states in his comments, they could not legally reject NBC&#8217;s offer. Someone please explain to me why they should be attacked for, I don&#8217;t know, following the law.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also not that hard for those of us with reading comprehension to understand this wasn&#8217;t produced during the strike, it wasn&#8217;t written during the strike, and NBC is buying a completed show, not a script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disgusted</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10647</link>
		<dc:creator>Disgusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10647</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth is exactly right -- a strike is a battle. Right now NBC, and the other media companies, are on the other side of that battle. If the media companies feel pain, they negotiate. Zwick and Herskovitz are alleviating NBC's pain, therefore, they are UNDERMINING the writers. Z and H are hurting a union to which they belong. They are getting paid while their fellow writers are out there hurting and picketing. Are they proud of that? 

Yes, I'm sure the show is horrendous, given their mediocre track record. And yes, maybe these kind of deals are the wave of the future. But this has nothing to do with how they are hurting writers THIS VERY MINUTE. How greedy and pathetic. This is as bad as Ellen. I'd really like to see the union take a stand here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth is exactly right &#8212; a strike is a battle. Right now NBC, and the other media companies, are on the other side of that battle. If the media companies feel pain, they negotiate. Zwick and Herskovitz are alleviating NBC&#8217;s pain, therefore, they are UNDERMINING the writers. Z and H are hurting a union to which they belong. They are getting paid while their fellow writers are out there hurting and picketing. Are they proud of that? </p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m sure the show is horrendous, given their mediocre track record. And yes, maybe these kind of deals are the wave of the future. But this has nothing to do with how they are hurting writers THIS VERY MINUTE. How greedy and pathetic. This is as bad as Ellen. I&#8217;d really like to see the union take a stand here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth, a former Bedford Falls fan</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10640</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth, a former Bedford Falls fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10640</guid>
		<description>I have to say, I don't buy Herskovitz's argument here AT ALL.

In any strike, scabs start being offered better deals -- things they would never be offered outside of the context of other workers refusing to work and the company being desperate to hire someone, to keep production going, and to break the strike. 

That doesn't mean that the scab offers represent a victory for the workers -- precisely because most workers would never be offered that, and all workers are LESS likely to get those kind of good deals when their collective action and solidarity is undermined. 

An an analogy, imagine workers in another industry on strike for health care, and suddenly during the strike, scabs start being offered vastly higher wages (as happens in all strikes). Would anyone buy an argument that those wages were a "victory" for workers because workers need higher wages? No, because everyone would understand that this wasn't some sort of permanent change in the company's thinking that made them magically willing to pay more -- it would be a temporary maneuver to set back the demands of the strike, and there's no way the higher wages would continue afterward. Result: no higher wages and no health care, and a chance to have won something lost.

So, does anyone believe that if this strike loses, lots of writers are now going to have new avenues for owning their own writing a la H &#38; Z? I don't. It is impossible for me to see Herskovitz and Zwick's deal as a step forward for writers' creative control, because it was made in the context of (and serves the purpose for NBC of) giving most writers less power. 

I see Herskovitz's argument as utterly disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I don&#8217;t buy Herskovitz&#8217;s argument here AT ALL.</p>
<p>In any strike, scabs start being offered better deals &#8212; things they would never be offered outside of the context of other workers refusing to work and the company being desperate to hire someone, to keep production going, and to break the strike. </p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean that the scab offers represent a victory for the workers &#8212; precisely because most workers would never be offered that, and all workers are LESS likely to get those kind of good deals when their collective action and solidarity is undermined. </p>
<p>An an analogy, imagine workers in another industry on strike for health care, and suddenly during the strike, scabs start being offered vastly higher wages (as happens in all strikes). Would anyone buy an argument that those wages were a &#8220;victory&#8221; for workers because workers need higher wages? No, because everyone would understand that this wasn&#8217;t some sort of permanent change in the company&#8217;s thinking that made them magically willing to pay more &#8212; it would be a temporary maneuver to set back the demands of the strike, and there&#8217;s no way the higher wages would continue afterward. Result: no higher wages and no health care, and a chance to have won something lost.</p>
<p>So, does anyone believe that if this strike loses, lots of writers are now going to have new avenues for owning their own writing a la H &amp; Z? I don&#8217;t. It is impossible for me to see Herskovitz and Zwick&#8217;s deal as a step forward for writers&#8217; creative control, because it was made in the context of (and serves the purpose for NBC of) giving most writers less power. </p>
<p>I see Herskovitz&#8217;s argument as utterly disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean S.</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10636</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10636</guid>
		<description>There is a precedent for unions assisting their members to become management. Even the Steelworkers in the mid 90's helped some of their shuttered locals re-purchase their factories and start production again. United Electrical represents a number of worker-owned businesses. There's no reason why the WGA can't assist writers in negotiating their own equity deals, as long as 1) the deals would not undercut WGA minimums (you can't form a company and then sell your product to the networks for less than what a WGA member would get) and 2) writer/owner-companies would strike when the broader WGA strikes. With these two rules in place, such deals as quarterlife has put together would benefit in creating more independent production firms, diluting the majors power, and shore up pension and health care funding by bringing worker owners under those plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a precedent for unions assisting their members to become management. Even the Steelworkers in the mid 90&#8217;s helped some of their shuttered locals re-purchase their factories and start production again. United Electrical represents a number of worker-owned businesses. There&#8217;s no reason why the WGA can&#8217;t assist writers in negotiating their own equity deals, as long as 1) the deals would not undercut WGA minimums (you can&#8217;t form a company and then sell your product to the networks for less than what a WGA member would get) and 2) writer/owner-companies would strike when the broader WGA strikes. With these two rules in place, such deals as quarterlife has put together would benefit in creating more independent production firms, diluting the majors power, and shore up pension and health care funding by bringing worker owners under those plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaatu</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10633</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaatu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10633</guid>
		<description>Look, the show is a turd. It'll fail on NBC for sure. Let's not worry about it too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, the show is a turd. It&#8217;ll fail on NBC for sure. Let&#8217;s not worry about it too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10593</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10593</guid>
		<description>In response to "writer"

They didn't sell the scripts to the network. They sold a completed show. As in a written, shot, and edited show. Not a script. People are mad about this, I understand, but a lot of people comment without even reading the posts...at least read what's going on before posting a response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to &#8220;writer&#8221;</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t sell the scripts to the network. They sold a completed show. As in a written, shot, and edited show. Not a script. People are mad about this, I understand, but a lot of people comment without even reading the posts&#8230;at least read what&#8217;s going on before posting a response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WGA Power</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10591</link>
		<dc:creator>WGA Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10591</guid>
		<description>It's admirable that Zwick &#38; Herskovitz have negotiated a next-generation deal for writers.  HOWEVER, let's face it--their sale of Quarterlife to NBC hardly shores up the writers' position during a strike.  In fact, it UNDERCUTS the strike because THEY'RE FEEDING SCAB PROGRAMMING to NBC, a struck company.  Not to mention, they were producing (and no doubt rewriting) the internet show during a strike to premiere on MySpace, a News Corp company--ANOTHER STRUCK COMPANY.  I know that the Internet isn't covered by the WGA, if Herskovitz wants to split hairs.  But now Quarterlife is bona fide TV, as Zwick &#38; Herskovitz had always intended.  How bout they step in line with all their other less established--not to mention, less wealthy-- showrunners in a show of support.  The people we should really applaud are the Shonda Rhimes, Shawn Ryans, and Greg Berlantis of the world--as well as over 100 other top showrunners who won't cross the picket line.  Those are the real heroes, who are making real sacrifices.  Shame on Zwick &#38; Herskovitz.  Those two WGA members know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s admirable that Zwick &amp; Herskovitz have negotiated a next-generation deal for writers.  HOWEVER, let&#8217;s face it&#8211;their sale of Quarterlife to NBC hardly shores up the writers&#8217; position during a strike.  In fact, it UNDERCUTS the strike because THEY&#8217;RE FEEDING SCAB PROGRAMMING to NBC, a struck company.  Not to mention, they were producing (and no doubt rewriting) the internet show during a strike to premiere on MySpace, a News Corp company&#8211;ANOTHER STRUCK COMPANY.  I know that the Internet isn&#8217;t covered by the WGA, if Herskovitz wants to split hairs.  But now Quarterlife is bona fide TV, as Zwick &amp; Herskovitz had always intended.  How bout they step in line with all their other less established&#8211;not to mention, less wealthy&#8211; showrunners in a show of support.  The people we should really applaud are the Shonda Rhimes, Shawn Ryans, and Greg Berlantis of the world&#8211;as well as over 100 other top showrunners who won&#8217;t cross the picket line.  Those are the real heroes, who are making real sacrifices.  Shame on Zwick &amp; Herskovitz.  Those two WGA members know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagazzi</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10580</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagazzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10580</guid>
		<description>Herskovitz also responds to the issue on the quarterlife message boards...

http://www.quarterlife.com/index.php?module=forum&#38;file=forum_view&#38;forumid=6&#38;assuntoforumid=2261</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herskovitz also responds to the issue on the quarterlife message boards&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.quarterlife.com/index.php?module=forum&amp;file=forum_view&amp;forumid=6&amp;assuntoforumid=2261" rel="nofollow">http://www.quarterlife.com/index.php?module=forum&amp;file=forum_view&amp;forumid=6&amp;assuntoforumid=2261</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writer</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10564</link>
		<dc:creator>writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10564</guid>
		<description>Wait.  You can sell a script you finished before the strike DURING the strike?  I can sell my specs to the networks or studios because they were written before the strike?  Can somebody explain this to me?  Are they saying that all that's happened since the strike began is that NBC said, "yes, we'll take it" to an existing proposal?  And ZH could say okay?  Can someone explain?  Seriously, I'm not being snarky.  I just don't get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait.  You can sell a script you finished before the strike DURING the strike?  I can sell my specs to the networks or studios because they were written before the strike?  Can somebody explain this to me?  Are they saying that all that&#8217;s happened since the strike began is that NBC said, &#8220;yes, we&#8217;ll take it&#8221; to an existing proposal?  And ZH could say okay?  Can someone explain?  Seriously, I&#8217;m not being snarky.  I just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon says strike!</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10556</link>
		<dc:creator>simon says strike!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10556</guid>
		<description>Never had much respect for these twerps, and it's because they're capable of this sort of crap. Ask any writer who has worked with them!

A struck company is a struck company. Let's not dance around this one.  It's embarrassing that you'd even try to explain this away, MH.
If Verrone was lame enough to agree to this deal, well... I've got another reason to wonder if he knows what he's doing!
That list just grows longer with each passing day. 

The most amusing part of this whole thing is how truly lame Quarterlife is. All of the people posting, the person reporting the story, the Guild... has anyone actually seen this drivel?
I'll tell you what, you're not alone. No one's tuning in online either!

There was screening a few weeks ago on a  local campus. 
After watching Quarterlife a kid responded, "it was a tv show" or something like it. 

The response from the creators, "you can't teach an old dog new tricks!

hahahaha. 

Thank the lord the WGA has agreed to go back to the negotiating table!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never had much respect for these twerps, and it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re capable of this sort of crap. Ask any writer who has worked with them!</p>
<p>A struck company is a struck company. Let&#8217;s not dance around this one.  It&#8217;s embarrassing that you&#8217;d even try to explain this away, MH.<br />
If Verrone was lame enough to agree to this deal, well&#8230; I&#8217;ve got another reason to wonder if he knows what he&#8217;s doing!<br />
That list just grows longer with each passing day. </p>
<p>The most amusing part of this whole thing is how truly lame Quarterlife is. All of the people posting, the person reporting the story, the Guild&#8230; has anyone actually seen this drivel?<br />
I&#8217;ll tell you what, you&#8217;re not alone. No one&#8217;s tuning in online either!</p>
<p>There was screening a few weeks ago on a  local campus.<br />
After watching Quarterlife a kid responded, &#8220;it was a tv show&#8221; or something like it. </p>
<p>The response from the creators, &#8220;you can&#8217;t teach an old dog new tricks!</p>
<p>hahahaha. </p>
<p>Thank the lord the WGA has agreed to go back to the negotiating table!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10553</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10553</guid>
		<description>My so-called Scabs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My so-called Scabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harley</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10541</link>
		<dc:creator>Harley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/zwickherskovitz-wga-friends-or-foes/#comment-10541</guid>
		<description>Well, gee.  For some the strike is a hardship.  For others?  It's a business opportunity!

Gack.  It woulda been nice had they waited for the strike to end.  There's a new generation of showrunners out there who clearly take it a bit more seriously.  Their sacrifices are even more laudable in this context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, gee.  For some the strike is a hardship.  For others?  It&#8217;s a business opportunity!</p>
<p>Gack.  It woulda been nice had they waited for the strike to end.  There&#8217;s a new generation of showrunners out there who clearly take it a bit more seriously.  Their sacrifices are even more laudable in this context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
