<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 'Wall-E' Orbiting Best Picture Oscar Nod?</title>
	<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alia</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-94208</link>
		<dc:creator>Alia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-94208</guid>
		<description>I love to see WALL-E get nominated for Best Picture.  Actually I think it deserves a win.

Also, there was wonderful sound editing and mixing by Ben Burtt, he might even deserve a Special Achievement.

And there was a beautful score by Newman.  Derserves nomintaion.

Most importantly, Stanton derserves a win for Best Original Screenplay.  Beautiful storytelling, beautiful originality.

But what makes those voters discriminate animated movie?  

WALL-E FOR BEST PICTURE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love to see WALL-E get nominated for Best Picture.  Actually I think it deserves a win.</p>
<p>Also, there was wonderful sound editing and mixing by Ben Burtt, he might even deserve a Special Achievement.</p>
<p>And there was a beautful score by Newman.  Derserves nomintaion.</p>
<p>Most importantly, Stanton derserves a win for Best Original Screenplay.  Beautiful storytelling, beautiful originality.</p>
<p>But what makes those voters discriminate animated movie?  </p>
<p>WALL-E FOR BEST PICTURE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-92020</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-92020</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't count on it but WALL-E deserves a nomination for Best Picture.

That "arrogence" of Stanton is not arrogence at all.  He says he "doesn't care what the audience thinks."

He kinda right.  After all, the audience grows more narrow-minded as time pass.  They want entertainment, not good storyline.  WHat do audience these days know about "profound" movies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t count on it but WALL-E deserves a nomination for Best Picture.</p>
<p>That &#8220;arrogence&#8221; of Stanton is not arrogence at all.  He says he &#8220;doesn&#8217;t care what the audience thinks.&#8221;</p>
<p>He kinda right.  After all, the audience grows more narrow-minded as time pass.  They want entertainment, not good storyline.  WHat do audience these days know about &#8220;profound&#8221; movies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name Withheld For Obvious Reasons</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-82753</link>
		<dc:creator>Name Withheld For Obvious Reasons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-82753</guid>
		<description>to quote Bill Hicks, "people in marketing and advertising need to kill themselves." i couldn't agree with him more. we don't need these people to dictate what the general public should enjoy and buy. i have to deal with these people at Warners and the things they come up with to "sell it to the people" is absurd, to say the least. it's bad enough that i have to conform my work to satisfy them half the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to quote Bill Hicks, &#8220;people in marketing and advertising need to kill themselves.&#8221; i couldn&#8217;t agree with him more. we don&#8217;t need these people to dictate what the general public should enjoy and buy. i have to deal with these people at Warners and the things they come up with to &#8220;sell it to the people&#8221; is absurd, to say the least. it&#8217;s bad enough that i have to conform my work to satisfy them half the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-82518</link>
		<dc:creator>C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-82518</guid>
		<description>If AMPAS nominates WALL-E it would become shockingly in touch with the home viewership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If AMPAS nominates WALL-E it would become shockingly in touch with the home viewership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katsat</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81982</link>
		<dc:creator>katsat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81982</guid>
		<description>Pixar as a whole has ALWAYS created movies without aiming at what audiences think, and they have NEVER been afraid to say so. They make movies that THEY want to see, what THEY care about and what THEY find exciting and interesting. That is not arrogance; that is creativity. 

So-called Hollywood marketers wouldn't know what creativity is without dollar signs stamped on it.

If success depends on what Hollywood marketers think, Pixar would have been another Dreamworks. Thankfully, Pixar is always will be Pixar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pixar as a whole has ALWAYS created movies without aiming at what audiences think, and they have NEVER been afraid to say so. They make movies that THEY want to see, what THEY care about and what THEY find exciting and interesting. That is not arrogance; that is creativity. </p>
<p>So-called Hollywood marketers wouldn&#8217;t know what creativity is without dollar signs stamped on it.</p>
<p>If success depends on what Hollywood marketers think, Pixar would have been another Dreamworks. Thankfully, Pixar is always will be Pixar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81661</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81661</guid>
		<description>I haven't seen Wall-E yet, but it seems like a great movie based upon word of mouth and the positive reviews.  

Pixar is overdue for a best picture nomination.  It's too bad that Wall-E like Ratatouille will probably be put in the animated feature category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen Wall-E yet, but it seems like a great movie based upon word of mouth and the positive reviews.  </p>
<p>Pixar is overdue for a best picture nomination.  It&#8217;s too bad that Wall-E like Ratatouille will probably be put in the animated feature category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckn8</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81601</link>
		<dc:creator>ckn8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81601</guid>
		<description>Give me a break. Pixar has an excellent track record of making films that are interesting beyond being lowest common denominator crap. IF they were trying to make movies specifically for marketing, Ratatouille or this half-silent film would have never got made. They've earned the luxury of not having to make films based on marketing reports because they're excellent work has built them a cache that people respect.

And to Ricco, above...

How can you quote Stanton and then reply to his comments by saying this is the exact reason attendance is down. Pixar is one of the most successful studios of it's type in history... they're doing it the right way, and it's paying off both financially and artistically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a break. Pixar has an excellent track record of making films that are interesting beyond being lowest common denominator crap. IF they were trying to make movies specifically for marketing, Ratatouille or this half-silent film would have never got made. They&#8217;ve earned the luxury of not having to make films based on marketing reports because they&#8217;re excellent work has built them a cache that people respect.</p>
<p>And to Ricco, above&#8230;</p>
<p>How can you quote Stanton and then reply to his comments by saying this is the exact reason attendance is down. Pixar is one of the most successful studios of it&#8217;s type in history&#8230; they&#8217;re doing it the right way, and it&#8217;s paying off both financially and artistically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lu-ee</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81498</link>
		<dc:creator>lu-ee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81498</guid>
		<description>how idiotic if the loss or win of an oscar is based on that NY Times interview. ...

so i really wonder if Hitchcock, Ford, Wyler, Wilder, Scorsese, Speilberg et al, you know, the GREAT directors, read about market surveys when creating their most famous &#38; artistically significant movies? i mean really, think about it, any of the directors i named, even Speilberg and his sequels, created their best creative works when simply doing a pic based on their own sincere &#38; profound ideas of what makes a great motion picture or on a idea/topic they felt needed to be made into a pic. MANY of these types of films were successful as well as creative. MANY of them TOOK RISKS. MANY of these films did not win an oscar. in Hitch's case NOTE ONE OF HIS FILMS WON AN OSCAR. CAN YOU IMAGINE? ho lame the oscar can be. 

also, if you look at Speilberg for instance, if he only made movies that were based on survey popularity contests, would we have created Close Encounters, Empire of the Sun, Schindler's List etc...? In fact, before making Close Encounters, he was offered to do a Jaws 2 sequel because it was popular, yet he rejected doing it. Thank the Lord he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how idiotic if the loss or win of an oscar is based on that NY Times interview. &#8230;</p>
<p>so i really wonder if Hitchcock, Ford, Wyler, Wilder, Scorsese, Speilberg et al, you know, the GREAT directors, read about market surveys when creating their most famous &amp; artistically significant movies? i mean really, think about it, any of the directors i named, even Speilberg and his sequels, created their best creative works when simply doing a pic based on their own sincere &amp; profound ideas of what makes a great motion picture or on a idea/topic they felt needed to be made into a pic. MANY of these types of films were successful as well as creative. MANY of them TOOK RISKS. MANY of these films did not win an oscar. in Hitch&#8217;s case NOTE ONE OF HIS FILMS WON AN OSCAR. CAN YOU IMAGINE? ho lame the oscar can be. </p>
<p>also, if you look at Speilberg for instance, if he only made movies that were based on survey popularity contests, would we have created Close Encounters, Empire of the Sun, Schindler&#8217;s List etc&#8230;? In fact, before making Close Encounters, he was offered to do a Jaws 2 sequel because it was popular, yet he rejected doing it. Thank the Lord he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81478</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81478</guid>
		<description>Marketing is just a necessary evil to get your movies out there.  Pixar has the best track record of every studio in the industry.  The quote would only offend you if you don't care about art or storytelling.  It's amazing how these comments are 100% on the side of Stanton.  And I just saw the movie, and it's a MASTERPIECE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketing is just a necessary evil to get your movies out there.  Pixar has the best track record of every studio in the industry.  The quote would only offend you if you don&#8217;t care about art or storytelling.  It&#8217;s amazing how these comments are 100% on the side of Stanton.  And I just saw the movie, and it&#8217;s a MASTERPIECE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81429</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81429</guid>
		<description>FTR, the NYT interview with Stanton by Katrina Onstad  is at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/movies/22onst.html?_r=1&#38;oref=slogin&#38;pagewanted=all

Context is everything and once you've read it, it's clear that the marketing peep(s) that NF talked to have an axe to grind.  It'll be interesting to read any follow-ups NF has from anonymous sources on the pro-Stanton side, especially if Wall-E is even a modest hit.

  -- Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FTR, the NYT interview with Stanton by Katrina Onstad  is at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/movies/22onst.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/movies/22onst.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;pagewanted=all</a></p>
<p>Context is everything and once you&#8217;ve read it, it&#8217;s clear that the marketing peep(s) that NF talked to have an axe to grind.  It&#8217;ll be interesting to read any follow-ups NF has from anonymous sources on the pro-Stanton side, especially if Wall-E is even a modest hit.</p>
<p>  &#8212; Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanton's Right!</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81416</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanton's Right!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81416</guid>
		<description>Are you kidding me?  Yeah, I'm sure Andrew Stanton, of all people, has "disdain" for his audience.  What shallow criticism.  All he was saying is that he doesn't make creative decisions based on what he or some executives think the audience would prefer to see.  And by the way, if EVERY filmmaker had the same approach, we'd get a lot more great movies.  Quit your whining, you slags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me?  Yeah, I&#8217;m sure Andrew Stanton, of all people, has &#8220;disdain&#8221; for his audience.  What shallow criticism.  All he was saying is that he doesn&#8217;t make creative decisions based on what he or some executives think the audience would prefer to see.  And by the way, if EVERY filmmaker had the same approach, we&#8217;d get a lot more great movies.  Quit your whining, you slags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milo</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81408</link>
		<dc:creator>milo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81408</guid>
		<description>"This is what happened when your ego gets the better of your talent. Think Shyamalan."

Um, what???  What happens?  You end up with movies that get 98% positive reviews?  And I'll bet audiences love it as well, and it makes a big pile of money?  Yeah, nobody would ever want THAT to happen.

Shyamalan is a guy with a couple early hits under his belt that increasingly seem like flukes.  Stanton has hit home runs on every project, with critics, with audiences, with awards, and at the box office.

The folks at Pixar have talent that would probably justify ANY amount of ego, but they still seem pretty down to earth.

There's no question that Pixar cares about their audience.  They absolutely do test screenings and get reactions, and they absolutely do create movies by "committee".  The difference is their team of guys is a bunch of hugely talented creatives, not decisions made by suits.  If anything, they tweak based on audience reaction and work as a team way MORE than most other movies, that's probably the reason they have been so successful and consistent.

They just don't care about what suits and marketing guys think, nor do they pander to lowest common denominator tastes like Shrek's pop culture references.  They figure out what audiences will like instead of asking audiences what they like via questionnaire or other nonsense (which virtually always gives horrible results).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is what happened when your ego gets the better of your talent. Think Shyamalan.&#8221;</p>
<p>Um, what???  What happens?  You end up with movies that get 98% positive reviews?  And I&#8217;ll bet audiences love it as well, and it makes a big pile of money?  Yeah, nobody would ever want THAT to happen.</p>
<p>Shyamalan is a guy with a couple early hits under his belt that increasingly seem like flukes.  Stanton has hit home runs on every project, with critics, with audiences, with awards, and at the box office.</p>
<p>The folks at Pixar have talent that would probably justify ANY amount of ego, but they still seem pretty down to earth.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no question that Pixar cares about their audience.  They absolutely do test screenings and get reactions, and they absolutely do create movies by &#8220;committee&#8221;.  The difference is their team of guys is a bunch of hugely talented creatives, not decisions made by suits.  If anything, they tweak based on audience reaction and work as a team way MORE than most other movies, that&#8217;s probably the reason they have been so successful and consistent.</p>
<p>They just don&#8217;t care about what suits and marketing guys think, nor do they pander to lowest common denominator tastes like Shrek&#8217;s pop culture references.  They figure out what audiences will like instead of asking audiences what they like via questionnaire or other nonsense (which virtually always gives horrible results).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmay</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81407</link>
		<dc:creator>jmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81407</guid>
		<description>I remember about ten years ago a movie was about to come out, everyone was talking about the gigantic ego of the director, and how it had a basically depressing story line.

The marketing people all laughed... "Who the hell wants to see this movie -- the ship sinks!!"

Fox was so scared they sold off the domestic rights to Paramount.

Cynical Hollywood folks still know that it's correct to cringe when the word Titanic is uttered.  But last I remember, the thing grossed a gajillion dollars and won a gajillion oscars.

Wall-E will be hugely successful and it will get nominated for Best picture and it might very well win.  Pixar is overdue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember about ten years ago a movie was about to come out, everyone was talking about the gigantic ego of the director, and how it had a basically depressing story line.</p>
<p>The marketing people all laughed&#8230; &#8220;Who the hell wants to see this movie &#8212; the ship sinks!!&#8221;</p>
<p>Fox was so scared they sold off the domestic rights to Paramount.</p>
<p>Cynical Hollywood folks still know that it&#8217;s correct to cringe when the word Titanic is uttered.  But last I remember, the thing grossed a gajillion dollars and won a gajillion oscars.</p>
<p>Wall-E will be hugely successful and it will get nominated for Best picture and it might very well win.  Pixar is overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Kusinitz</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81406</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Kusinitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81406</guid>
		<description>The animators of the old  Warner Bros. cartoons admitted they were out to amuse only themselves; the audience was secondary. Result: They created countless classic works that have been celebrated and analyzed endlessly ever since. 

Market research does nothing but destroy creativity. Stanton should keep on doing what he's doing. Nobody else in Hollywood seems to care about originality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The animators of the old  Warner Bros. cartoons admitted they were out to amuse only themselves; the audience was secondary. Result: They created countless classic works that have been celebrated and analyzed endlessly ever since. </p>
<p>Market research does nothing but destroy creativity. Stanton should keep on doing what he&#8217;s doing. Nobody else in Hollywood seems to care about originality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris W.</title>
		<link>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81400</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wall-e-on-its-way-to-a-best-picture-oscar-nod/#comment-81400</guid>
		<description>"Disdain for the audience"? Oh, give me a fucking break. I can't believe you even stooped to dignify that comment by printing it--let alone suggested it reflects some kind of backlash that will cost him at the Oscars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Disdain for the audience&#8221;? Oh, give me a fucking break. I can&#8217;t believe you even stooped to dignify that comment by printing it&#8211;let alone suggested it reflects some kind of backlash that will cost him at the Oscars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
