Comments on: No Pellicano Jury Verdict After First Week (...But You Can Judge This Letter)

By: DK3000

DK3000 — Thu, 15 May 2008 18:57:12 +0000

Field, Grey, Ovitz and the rest are so crooked they eat soup with a corkscrew! Everyone knows this within the entertainment industry and this will NEVER change.

If people do not like fleas they should never lay down with wealthy egotistical dogs.

The entertainment industry is not a business which bears a single shred of ethics or morals- they even produce movies which throw their perverted banality in people’s faces- yet the naive still come running for a shot a fame and fortune!

There would be no supply if there was no demand- and the entertainment industry is second only to politics/government/religion in terms of evil and cruelty.

The nightmare stories are all true- so send your pretty children to Hollywood whether they have talent or not, and watch them deteriorate and transmogrify into an apparition which you will not recognize.

Just look at Bert Field’s face in the article- really look at him. He and the rest are monsters and they live to consume your children with absolutely no conscious whatsoever!

By: Cue

Cue — Mon, 12 May 2008 21:01:00 +0000

Allison Hope Weiner has real integrity, not just the appearance of it.

By: fell off his white horse

fell off his white horse — Mon, 12 May 2008 20:36:32 +0000

Mr. Bert Fields used to be an “Entertainment” Attorney. Why didn’t he focus on just that?

He fell off his white horse when he started taking on cases for his clients that involved criminal activity.

Thus having to use a private investigator.

Who’s crying now.

By: Tell us again

Tell us again — Mon, 12 May 2008 20:09:23 +0000

Please tell us again why it was that Anthony Pellicano had to rent out an apartment in the other area codes outside of the 310 area code? For example it came out in court he had to rent an apartment in Pasadena so he could carry out his wiretaps.

Mr. Fields now is trying to silence Alison Hope Wiener with this letter.

By: open your brain

open your brain — Mon, 12 May 2008 19:51:19 +0000

Great PR stunt that letter is!
Not only did they wiretap, but they broke into these homes of the victims and bugged them. The phone these days also can be rigged to be used as a listening device. They can also install cameras in your home that you will never see. They also can bug your cars. And then they wiretap and bug your place of business. They can also do all of the above to any friends or lovers or relatives and attorney’s you have. Now on top of that they have you followed by cops 24/7 and have your social security number and bank accounts and any phone numbers you call and that call you digitally recorded. Now tell me that Fields et al. knew nothing of all of this and I would like to sell you some swamp land. These people also are the very people and their clients who finded this enterprise. They may have raped and murdered and manipulated people’s lives to ruination as heard on the audio tapes in court. Now they will all reap what they have sowed and they deserve all the “blacking up” that the character assassination they did to us. All to protect their box office darlings and the public from knowing the truth about the creeps they represent. So they become creeps themselves. Birds of a feather flock together Mr. Fields. Tell us again how Pellicano had to rent an apartment in the 818 area code so he could wiretap that area code phones.

By: open your brain

open your brain — Mon, 12 May 2008 19:37:33 +0000

By: calivueco

calivueco — Sat, 10 May 2008 22:10:56 +0000

it is all in how you listen to the tapes he INTENTIONALLY left in his office knowing that the feds would be dropping in……
like the film The Conversation…..
if you think that what pellicano is talking about on the tapes is wiretapping perhaps it is because you have been conditioned by the media (that has been controlled by the feds because the PR guys who used to work with Pellicano are cowards and are working for the feds in a sweetheart deal) then that is what you will believe….
but if you open your mind and listen with the intention of proving that what pellicano is saying about how he got the information has NOTHING TO DO WITH WIRETAPS! !then you will find that perhaps he was BSing his clients as to how he knew what he knew and so he could justify his exorbitant fees.
listen to tapes on Huffpost again and think that maybe pellicano had a network of sources that could rival the DNI.
and ask “is there any other way he could have gotten the information he is telling his clients he is getting on the tapes? that may also be construed as top secret…like he knows people on the other side of the case too!!! then you have reasonable doubt. i hope the Judge instructed the Jury to ask that very question.
he is an great asset and the DNI should recruit him. he was developing a interesting intelligence gathering and secure communications system for use by law enforcement and international corporations just like Kachikian testified. they should let him finish his work….

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 10 May 2008 20:13:52 +0000

No one is thinking that Bert openly approved of Pelicano’s questionable means. But we are thinking that Bert financially supported those questionable means and benefited from them for years - while purposefully turning a blind eye to the how he was being supplied with the most inside of information. Just because no one told Bert that there was wiretapping doesn’t mean he didn’t know it was going on.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 10 May 2008 19:47:23 +0000

oh please, don’t embarrass yourself eskenazi. this letter is so blatantly phoney and self-serving i don’t know where to start.

as these comments attest. fields was too smart NOT to know and if he chose to look the other way it was only to protect himself in exactly such a situation as this. yes, his ‘i knew nothing’ protects him legally but it cannot protect him from public opinion. he’s a greedy muckraker.

By: Shilly Shillerson von Shill

Shilly Shillerson von Shill — Sat, 10 May 2008 19:23:33 +0000

How dare you? This wild speculation that the government had any evidence that Pellicano ever wiretapped is hatefully absurd and speaks of a soul clenched in a fistlike hysteria, an endless inner torpor of malice and dark lies.

By: outsiders

outsiders — Sat, 10 May 2008 18:53:36 +0000

of course they knew

and if you can swallow that they didn’t, it was their duty to know how such confidential info was being obtained

interesting that eveyone knew except the sharpest lawyers in town who hired them

By: santamonicabeachboy

santamonicabeachboy — Sat, 10 May 2008 17:19:05 +0000

Common Sense, Ms. Eskenazi, Common Sense.

Please apply it here. It’s a simple concept.

Obviously, Bert, et al, did not play by the rules. They cheated. They lied. They hurt people. They pretended not to know. But, they knew.

You are now struggling with your professional legacy and what lessons to teach your kids, if you have any, from this sorry story.

Keep it simple. Keep it clean. Apologize. Accept responsibility. Make changes going forward. Live an honorable life.

By: oh come on

oh come on — Sat, 10 May 2008 09:54:39 +0000

If they didn’t suspect wiretapping was going on, these lawyers had to be from Mayberry. I mean, seriously. They had to know.

By: calivueco

calivueco — Sat, 10 May 2008 04:44:57 +0000

bert fields and marty singer and others were not indicted for the same reason pellicano should not have been….lack of evidence of wiretaps.
government was being used by an enemy of pellicano who had a vendetta against him. it is an abuse of the US attorneys office and the fbi.

By: eskenazi is useless

eskenazi is useless — Sat, 10 May 2008 02:44:50 +0000

give us a break, eskenazi

she gets an “A” for brown nosing, and the rest is too ridiculous to even waste energy addressing