The very idea that tonight's Emmy showcast on NBC was so scripted-in-stone that neither the network nor host Conan O'Brien could change a word of the broadcast opener, or decide not to show it altogether and substitute another skit crafted at the last minute, is absurd. After all, isn't that the reason Hollywood pays writers for these awards shows? C'mon, couldn't one executive or producer, much less Conan or the television academy that puts on the Emmys, pipe up and say, "Uh, maybe starting with a plane crash comedy skit on the same day there was an actual plane crash might be in poor taste? Let's rewrite." But, noooooooooo. Now the NBC affiliate general manager at the Lexington, Kentucky, site of today's tragedy says he was "horrified" by NBC's callousness. “We wish somebody had thought this through. It’s somewhere between ignorance and incompetence.” So I ask: Will someone get fired for this? Host Conan riffed off the ABC's series Lost which was all-but-ignored by the Emmies by starting the ceremony with a filmed comedy bit in which O'Brien was seen sipping champagne aboard a jetliner. "What could possibly go wrong tonight?" he says — before the plane crashes onto an island resembling the one in ABC's drama. Today, in Lexington, Kentucky, commuter jet Delta Comair Flight 5191 mistakenly trying to take off on a runway that was too short crashed into a field Sunday and burst into flames, according to media reports, killing 49 people and leaving the lone survivor -- a co-pilot -- in critical condition. Really, is there even one person at NBC with a brain left in his head?
Understandably, the NBC affiliate in Lexington, WLEX Channel 18, was shocked and dismayed by NBC's Emmy broadcast opener. According to news reports, the Lex 18 News was just ending a recap of the crash coverage when the station saw the Conan plane spoof skit come over the live feed. WLEX’s president and general manager, Tim Gilbert, was home watching the telecast with his family and would have pulled the plug on the Emmy broadcast if only NBC network execs had had the sense to warn him ahead of time. "It was a live telecast — we were completely helpless,” Gilbert told the local newspaper. “By the time we began to react, it was over. At the station, we were as horrified as they were at home.” Gilbert said he’ll complain to NBC, but he said an apology won’t make up for insensitivity. “They could have killed the opening and it wouldn't have hurt the show at all,” Gilbert said. Here's the video of the poor taste skit if you missed it.
We all know that Hollywood's executive suites are populated by Hollywood's Napoleons. Long on ego, short on stature. So now the latest working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research finds that tall people are smarter than their height-challenged peers. "As early as age three -- before schooling has had a chance to play a role -- and throughout childhood, taller children perform significantly better on cognitive tests," wrote Anne Case and Christina Paxson of Princeton University in the paper published by the NBER. To read the study, click here. Which reminds me, back in 1999 when court testimony in the Disney v Katzenberg lawsuit brought out that tall Michael Eisner called short Jeffrey a "midget," I penned this little brief about Hollywood's Napoleons for New York magazine. Enjoy.
Here's yet one more reason why rival Hollywood studios are salivating to use the newly branded Brad Grey Wimp Factor to get a leg up on Paramount with talent. Newsweek just ensured that Paramount boss Brad Grey has no deniability in the Viacom vs Cruise cock-up. "Critics saw it as evidence that Paramount chairman Brad Grey and his boss, Tom Freston, were powerless. Redstone says that's false. 'We were all in agreement about ending Tom Cruise's production deal,' Redstone tells Newsweek. 'I have complete faith in Tom and Brad, and they are clearly running the business.' Last Friday, Grey spoke directly about the matter to Newsweek: 'Sumner is a maverick. He said what he felt, and that's his prerogative. He certainly didn't ask my permission, and I'm certain, knowing Sumner as I do, that he felt no obligation to. He built the place." What I find most disturbing here is that Grey is so pussy-whipped that he couldn't even get permission from Redstone to at least disagree about a public diss of a star who's made $3 billion in box office gross for the studio. At best, Grey offered this weak kiss-ass. "I still admire Tom Cruise," Brad told Newsweek. "He's a huge movie star, and a great actor, and I'm sure we'll work together in the future.'" So let's analyze: Sumner says everyone agreed to dump Cruise's production deal, including Brad; but Brad implies Sumner did it on his own. Talk about trying to play both sides against the middle, eh? And now Brad supposedly wants to work with Tiny Tom again? Grey even told Time that he "wouldn't rule anything out" about a Mission Impossible 4. To which Cruise's producing partner Paula Wagner laughingly told Newsweek, "If it's the right script, why not? We created that franchise." Hmm, this smacks of a Paramount peace offering in the form of a big fat commission to CAA. Note to Brad Grey: Next time you're being bitch-slapped, don't wait to give your side (as lame as it is) to the newsweeklies. That's so dial-up.
All of Hollywood had their eyes on the box office of popular hip hop group Outkast's Idlewild from Universal this weekend since, historically, musicians who try to crossover into film rarely have luck although rap and hip hop artists have had a better time of it than most. (Eminem's 8 Mile...) Playing in just 973 theaters, the Universal movie did $2.1 mil Friday and $2.2 mil Saturday which puts its weekend opening total at $5.9 mil. I, for one, wish Outkast had done something more contemporary than this tired Harlem Nights retread (and that movie killed Eddie Murphy's film career, for awhile). But its per-screen average was a jazzy $6,055 despite mixed reviews. Meanwhile, MSNBC.com provides some compelling yes-and-no answers to the eternally asked question, Is Outkast breaking up? (Please, god, no. I love these guys...)
Argument: OutKast is over... The Idlewild soundtrack stinks! The movie stinks too! It’s a rap musical set in the 30s — that’s just stupid (some say). Andre "3000" Patton’s tough-guy speakeasy owner and Antwan "Big Boi" Benjamin’s tortured piano player are two-dimensional, and neither has the acting chops to make up for it. Director Bryan Barber comes from music videos, and his nausea-inducing jump cuts make it show. Plus, all the female characters are either harpies or hos. André only wants to sing and be weird. They haven’t really worked together for six years. All their outside interests keep them from the hip-hop. Benjamin is developing a clothing line and working on a Cartoon Network series. This fall, Patton releases his second solo record on his own label, Purple Ribbon. Both are pursing acting careers. (Besides “Idlewild,” Benjamin’s been in Four Brothers and Be Cool and Patton got great reviews in ATL.) High school couples never stay together. Ask Dr. Phil
Argument: OutKast is forever... The Idlewild soundtrack is misunderstood. The movie has a lot going for it. OutKast is, was, and will always be about experimentation. Big Boi and former presidential candidate Wesley Clark agree. (In a 2003 campaign ad, Clark tells some young constituents, “I don’t care what the other candidates say, I don’t think OutKast is really breaking up.” And in a recent AP interview, Patton confirmed it. “All them haters would love for us to break up … sorry haters!”) It’s good for couples to have outside interests. Ask Dr. Phil.
SUNDAY UPDATE: U.S. moviegoers made sports films #1 and #2 at the box office this weekend. There's nothing more predictable, as the NFL returns to television, than a movie about a down-on-his-luck guy who attempts an against-the-odds shot at making a pro football team. So I'm told Disney's formulaic Invincible starring Mark Wahlberg opened in 2,917 theaters with so-so numbers that were still better than expected -- earning $5.4 million Friday but up 30% Saturday with $6.7 million so that makes for a $17.2 mil weekend. (Weekend figures include Sunday estimates.) The Warner Bros' lame comedy Beerfest staggered into 2,964 theaters Friday with just $2.7 mil, and -13% less for $2.2 mil Saturday, for what is a weak $6.7 mil opening -- extending that studio's cold streak this very hot summer. Meanwhile, Warner Communications' sister studio, New Line, continues to be embarrassed by the utter collapse of Snakes on a Plane, down an ugly 72% its second weekend for what is only a $6.1 mil weekend. And, to top it off, New Line's new entry How to Eat Fried Worms can't even wiggle its way into the top 10, earning on Friday just $1.3 mil for what's only a $4.1 mil weekend. But Sony's hot comedy Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby finished No. 2 by revving another $2.4 mil Friday and $3.3 mil Saturday for an $8 mil weekend. The biggest surprise was No. 3, Fox Searchlight's Little Miss Sunshine, one of the best-reviewed movies of the summer. After lighting up with $2 mil Friday and $3.0 mil Saturday, it's posting a $7.2 mil weekend. Universal's Accepted did $2.1 mil Friday and another $2.5 Saturday to finish up $6.5 mil for the Fri-Sat-Sun.
Meanwhile, all of Hollywood had their eyes on the box office of popular hip hop group Outkast's Idlewild this weekend since, historically, musicians who try to crossover into film rarely have luck -- although rap and hip hop artists have had a better time of it than most. Playing in just 973 theaters, the Universal movie did $2.1 mil Friday and $2.2 mil Saturday which puts its weekend opening total at $5.9 mil. But its per-screen average was a jazzy $6,055 despite the mixed reviews. And, in case you were wondering, Paramount's World Trade Center did $1.7 mil Friday and $2.6 mil Saturday adding about $6.2 mil for the weekend which finally puts the controversial Oliver Stone film over the $50 mil mark.
So this is the fab Republican "friend" whom Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and Haim Saban and some other so-called Hollywood Democrats are financially and politically supporting in this November's California gubernatorial election? Media reports today say Arnold Schwarzenegger has finally settled that lawsuit brought by Anna Richardson, the British TV host who accused the actor of groping her and two of his top political aides of later smearing her reputation because she came after him. Let's not forget that one of those aides, Sean Walsh, played a pivotal role in that horrible mess involving Los Angeleno stuntwoman Rhonda Miller who also dared to come forward before 2003's recall election and accuse Schwarzenegger of groping her. Here's my 2003 LA Weekly "Deadline Hollywood" column with the details about it, Arnold's True Lies. As everyone knows, the burden to prove libel is lower in the British courts than in U.S. courts. Miller wasn't as successful with her libel lawsuit: it was dismissed by a Los Angeles judge.
Previous: What? Spielberg, Katzenberg & Saban Supporting 'Friend' Arnold
No, I didn't write this: I received this in my email and found it amusing. In the interest of fairness, send me fake trade articles, emails or internal memos for CAA or ICM or Endeavor or United Talent, and I'll post the best one for each agency. Labor Day lazy days, right?
WMA To Open Dubai Office
by Colom Asiseeum, Variety International
In what many in Hollywood are calling a surprising move, the venerable ten percentery, William Morris Agency, announced today that later this fall it would open the first branch office of an American based talent agency in the Arab world. "Times are changing," said Morris' COO Irv Weintraub. "1.2 billion Muslims want to be entertained and we are in a unique position to make that happen. After all, we once represented Omar Sharif, Maria "Midnight at the Oasis" Muldaur, Sabu and Arthur Sarkissian. No other Hollywood agency has the plethora of experience in the region that we do." "Things are already jumping." Weintraub went on to say. "We are bringing Stanley Donen out of retirement to direct an all-women-in-burqas production of "Seven Brides for Seven Brothers" at the Magic Carpet Dinner Theater in Riyadh which will star David Hasselhoff. Hasselhoff is huge in the Arab world." After a brief pause Weintraub corrected himself saying, "Actually in Germany but many Germans vacation in the region and that is important too." Additionally Weintraub says they are booking Michelle Kwan's "Arabian Nights On Ice" tour and have scheduled Michelle Wie for 18 holes of golf in Dubai in late 2009. Wei will also attend the opening of a Zales Jewelry store while in Dubai. Perhaps one of the oddest aspects of this venture is that William Morris will be staffing the office entirely with former employees. Below, Weintraub is seen photographing his crew, from left to right, Bobbi Thompson, Elaine Goldsmith, Toni Howard, Joan Hyler and Risa Shapiro (or maybe it's Arnold Stiefel...We're just not sure.):

What a convenient time for Brian Grazer to be off vacationing with family and out of touch with his office and reporters. But not out of touch with his Hollywood pals, thankfully. I'm told that the Imagine uber-producer is disputing to friends ever "making a congratulatory call" to Viacom Inc Chairman Sumner Redstone for dumping Tom Cruise's Paramount production deal, as the octogenarian claimed to the media. I've learned that Grazer is quietly explaining that he simply called Redstone "to ask what's going on." Redstone is now in a lot of hot water with Grazer for putting the producer in a lot of hot water with talent. As one Grazer intimate told me today, "anyone would be shocked to see a private phone call ever discussed publicly, much less reported in The New York Times." (The Los Angeles Times also had this.) It does seem a little counter-intuitive for Grazer to be lovin' Sumner's cost-cuttin' -- especially when Grazer himself makes studio perks a priority. On the other hand, let's not forget that Cruise's Far and Away was a big-budget box office failure for Imagine. Oh, and in case you were wondering whether David Geffen also disputes making a congratulatory call to Redstone, as the media also quoted Sumner claiming. In fact, Geffen, whose Interview With The Vampire starred Cruise and whose Dreamworks is now based at Viacom's Paramount, has been siding with Sumner in every heated Hollywood discussion about Redstone's are-you-shitting-me trashing of Tom.
Previous: Who's Crazier: Viacom or Tom Cruise?
Los Angeles subscribers to The New York Times still don't realize they are missing the "money quote" from Tom Cruise's attorney Bert Fields today in the newspaper's coverage of the Viacom vs Cruise war of the words. In the edition they received, the article's final paragraph has the actor's co-producer Paula Wagner claiming there are plans for that $100 million equity financing deal from a pair of hedge funds, and ends with this inocuous sentence: "But Mr. Fields, who has been out of the country, said he was unaware of those plans." But, after the reporters on the story jumped up and down in protest about the missing words, Bert's quote was restored online and in the NYC area late edition -- and boy, is it a doozie!
"But Mr. Fields said he was unaware of those plans. 'I don’t think Tom has raised $100 million in a hedge fund,' he said. 'And I know nothing about any such thing. I think that’s just talk.'” Let me reiterate: Bert is Tom's lawyer, not Sumner's. This is exactly why people respect Fields so much -- because he knows the truth hurts.
Remember what Viacom's mouthpiece told the NYT yesterday? "A spokesman for Mr. Redstone, Carl Folta, scoffed at Ms. Wagner’s talk of new financial backers. 'Did they give you a name?” he said.'" Isn't this just getting better and better?
Previous: Who's Crazier: Viacom or Tom Cruise?
The Los Angeles Times had this angle today, but screenwriter/columnist Bruce Feirstein said it first and funnier on LAObserved.com: "As anyone who’s ever worked in Hollywood will tell you, the basic social contract (“Local Law #1”) is that nobody ever tells the truth, about anything...So after decades of polite lies, I can’t help but wonder if my friend Sumner is going to start a trend here. Consider the following:
"Oldspeak: 'She was suffering from exhaustion.'
"Newspeak: 'She’s a drug-addled maniac.'
"Oldspeak: 'He left the project because of creative differences.'
"Newspeak: 'He demanded final cut, his ego was out of control, and he refused to meet the budget.'
"Oldspeak: 'He decided that in order to best serve his clients, he’s leaving the agency to set up a management company.'
"Newspeak: 'He was charging hookers and private jets to Vegas to the agency, so we booted him.'
"Oldspeak: 'He’s leaving the studio to pursue his original dream, which was making movies.'
"Newspeak: 'He couldn’t pick a winner if Steven Spielberg himself came in and pitched Jaws. So we threw his ass out of here.'
"Oldspeak: 'We love the pitch, but we have something just like it in development.'
"Newspeak: 'You're an overpriced hack.'
"Oldspeak: 'You were terrific in the audition, but they decided to go in a different direction.'
"Newspeak: 'You have no talent. But in the meantime, I’ll have the swordfish, grilled, no butter, with a small salad, and the dressing on the side.'
"Oldspeak: 'They loved your take, but they’ve decided to go with somebody else.'
"Newspeak: 'You’re 57, you haven’t directed a hit film in ten years, and there’s an MTV director they can control who offered to do it for half the price. And by the way, they also said you’re an overpriced hack who’s got no talent.'
"Oldspeak: 'I respect my competitors.'
"Newspeak: 'You know that sound - that 'thud-thud' you hear when you drive over the speed bumps in the studio parking lot? Well, every morning, when I hit them, I dream that it's Tom Rothman.'
Just thought I'd point out that Rogers & Cowan is having a helluva summer in terms of celeb crises. The PR agency represents not only Mel Gibson but also Tom Cruise. (Well, the good news for Gibson is that Cruise's bad news gets Mel off media minds.) No wonder Tom's latest flack Paul Bloch called around town yesterday asking the power players about Viacom vs Cruise, "Whaddaya think?" The overwhelming response was a thumbs-up for Tom's career. "He looks like a victim," one studio mogul told Bloch. Only in Hollywood PR-think is that a good thing.
Previous: Who's Crazier: Viacom or Tom Cruise?
OK, I've heard the stories about how cheap Michael Eisner is. How he asks for change back when he slips a fiver to the valet parking attendant. And so on, ad nauseum. Still, it came as a huge surprise to me when TMZ.com, the Internet gossip site, reported that the ex-Disney honcho and wife Jane flew Jet Blue from LA's Burbank Airport to NYC yesterday. But now I'm told that Eisner, even though he's worth a cool half-billion dollars easy, loves Jet Blue and flies it all the time because he considers it safe and efficient. Frankly, I just don't get this; not when he can afford to timeshare a Gulfstream or at least fly commercial First Class. (Tip to Mikey: if you want to save $$$, then fly United's LAX-JFK Business Class Premium Service, which is nicer than first class and offers amazing legroom and edible food.) Could it be that Eisner is either a Jet Blue shareholder, or channelling cheapskate investor Warren Buffett, or angling for an endorsement contract?
One thing I do know: Eisner was not heading to tape his no-rated talk show for CNBC, for which GE Travel routinely books all NBC worker bees on the lowest-priced flights available. Even so, talent usually negotiates first class into their contracts. According to the report, Eisner and his wife showed up at Burbank Airport and bided their time in the terminal with iced coffees, which Eisner fetched himself. Then they boarded with everyone else and settled in 12th row seats. Next: the couple lining up for Barney's Santa Monica airport hangar sales?
Best Fashion One-Liner Ever: On Bravo's Project Runway 3 last night, designer/judge Michael Kors (why don't they describe him by that ridiculous 'jet set' moniker anymore?) said about Los Angeles contestant Jeffrey's plus-size sack: "That looks like Comme des Garçons goes to the Amish country."
What To Dread This Season: Exactly how the Weinstein Brothers, who coproduce the show, will slip in a not-so-subtle tie-in to one of their forthcoming films. Remember Season 1 when shoo-in designer Kara Saun based her entire collection on the bros' The Aviator -- and lost the grand prize because of unoriginality? My best guess is that this season's inspiration will be Quentin Tarantino's Killshot coming from The Weinstein Co. this fall. (I don't see much retro chic in their Miss Potter, about the life of Beatrix Potter, author of "The Tale of Peter Rabbit".) Far be it from Harvey to miss any opportunity for crass and inappropriate marketing.
Today, DHD passed 3,000,000 page views. Thank you so much.

If there’s suddenly a litmus test for insanity to be administered by the owners of Hollywood movie studios, then start with the executive suites. That’s my reaction to the are-you-shitting-me pronouncement by Viacom Inc. chairman Sumner Redstone today that his Paramount Pictures is terminating its 14-year relationship with Tom “Crazy” Cruise’s production company because the actor’s controversial and erratic off-screen behavior hurt the theatrical grosses of "Mission Impossible 3. Of course, the studio's publicity department worked overtime all summer to dispel just that notion whenever entertainment business reporters questioned whether Cruise's loony tunes might affect his appeal. "As much as we like him personally, we thought it was wrong to renew his deal," Mr. Redstone said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. "His recent conduct has not been acceptable to Paramount."
Granted Redstone was on a Rocky Mountain high, making his remarks in the thin air of Aspen Summit 2006 where his company was presenting before the digital world. And, granted, the octogenarian was seen wandering dazed and confused into the kitchen of The Grill in Beverly Hills not long ago. But, for the moment, I’ll assume he had all his mental faculties intact when he made his statement to the Journal. So, if I were a Viacom shareholder, I’d be asking Ol’ Sumner right now: Are you nuts? Fine, don’t do business anymore with the freakish dwarf actor who’ll never own an Oscar unless he buys one at auction and who gets an exorbitant amount for each movie. But why the fuck are you setting up his legal piranha (Bert Fields, who’s never lost a case) for what could well be the biggest lawsuit ever to hit Hollywood? (UPDATE: Bert's saying he won't sue.)
Already Cruise’s producing partner Paula Wagner called Redstone’s remarks "outrageous and disrespectful" and disputed his account of what happened during the negotiations to renew their studio pact. Not only did she claim Cruise / Wagner Productions terminated their talks with Paramount earlier in the week, but she said the time had come for Cruise and her to strike out on their own with an independent production deal financed to the tune of $100 million by two hedge funds. This might even be true. Meanwhile, everyone inside Paramount was diving for cover after Redstone’s remarks hit the wires, referring reporters to Viacom’s mealy mouthpiece Carl Folta. Studio chief Brad Grey, always the most politic mogul as well as the smallest, is now a eunuch, too, because his geriatric jerk of a boss cut off his balls to cut down Tom Terrible.
C’mon, fire the grinning actor idiot because he’s lost his box office appeal, or because his first dollar gross is so disgustingly huge that no studio has a prayer any more of making money on his motion pictures, or because of any other business reason. And fire him in the usual Hollywood way: with a bland-but-dignified press release about how much these 14 years have meant to both parties, ad nauseum. But, jeez, don’t fire him with this lame stuff that Sumner didn’t like the way Tiny Tom behaved. If that’s true, then no Hollywood studio can ever hire anyone. Drugs, sex, harrassment, mendacity, fraud: Paramount like most major studios has a rich history of horrible behavior by its work-for-hires. I could reel off for you 10 people now with rich studio deals, some at Paramount, who should be in jail or rehab or the Funny Farm but instead are well-paid miscreants.
Far be it from me to judge whether Cruise belongs in a straitjacket or not, or whether Scientology is a cult or a religion, or whether he’s gay or not, or whether MI3 would have done a lot more business in theaters if another big star had been the lead. But it’s absurd for Redstone to make an issue of Cruise’s conduct like he has. My god, Sumner himself was openly shtupping one of his producer girlfriends on the lot for years, and his own son is suing him. And Redstone looked the other way when Les Moonves carried on a long adulterous affair with employee Julie Chen and then married her after dumping his wife in the process. Which are all violations of so many corporate codes of conduct that I don’t think I can count that high. And let’s not forget how the old guy’s studio is still in business with Robert Evans who not only was a hopeless cocaine addict and regular client of Heidi Fleiss’s prostitution call girl ring for years but pled the Fifth Amendment in connection with a murder rap no less. And let's not forget that Redstone didn't blink when Brad Grey's name surfaced in that Anthony Pellicano (the thug P.I.) mess. So lemme get this straight: Cruise’s jumping around on Oprah’s couch is worse?
But the fact is that even Cruise’s recent moves, the ones done after he’d made Scientology the publicly avowed cause celebre of his life personally and professionally, and after he declared Katie Holmes the love of his life and knocked her up without benefit of marriage, are still top earners since 2000. Cruise did better for his studios with MI3, War of the Worlds, Collateral, The Last Samurai, Minority Report, Vanilla Sky and MI2 than almost any other star, including George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Nicole Kidman, Russell Crowe, Adam Sandler. My best guess is only Tom Hanks and Johnny Depp and Mel Gibson did better box office.
Let’s talk about Gibson. Last week, an erroneous report swept the Internet that Disney wasn’t going to distribute Gibson’s Mayan epic Apocalypto because of his drunken anti-Semitic tirade during his Malibu arrest. The corporation’s network ABC already had stopped Mel’s production company from producing a docudrama about The Holocaust. But the truth was that Disney movie toppers Dick Cook and Oren Aviv both called Gibson’s people to reassure that no way were they cutting Mel off at the knees when he was on his knees seeking the Jewish community’s absolution. For crissakes, it’s part of Hollywood lore that Walt Disney himself was an anti-Semite who reformed.
So go ahead, Tom, sue. (Or, better yet, get the litigious Scientology attack dogs to sue first). Get Sumner for all he’s worth. Which may be a lot in monetary terms but not even a penny in human ones.